Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Rrun Rrun

EL RRUN RRUN
http://rrunrrun.blogspot.com/


---------------------------------------------------------------
FIVE LITTLE MAIL-IN INDIANS...THEN THERE WERE NONE
---------------------------------------------------------------
By <b>Juan Montoya</b><br />The apartment complex off Paredes Line Road has seen its better days.<br />The manager of the half block of two-story brick buildings says they are not apartments, but rather owner-owned "condominiums."<br />The parking lot sports more than a few large potholes that must be navigated by motorists to prevent damage to their cars. The grass is unkempt. A swimming pool â€" once the center of social activity â€" lies empty behind locked wrought-iron gates.<br />"These units have the bedroom at the top of the stairs," said the manager. "There's a kitchen and a small living room downstairs. You can't have too many people inside at one time."<br /><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgS2rgIxfjnBJ-wous5MBoJCfEMkA3_ENEw0jY2EY8Q1ooh1TLq3Xu4rnKcz4KF0ImePUIswlHI-15Tyr024bOBDCVtZF9k17vWyIJ07zJ0_8IueiMkd3mjvxp5judW7swp9PXNYxhyphenhyphengX0/s1600/five(1).jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="206" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgS2rgIxfjnBJ-wous5MBoJCfEMkA3_ENEw0jY2EY8Q1ooh1TLq3Xu4rnKcz4KF0ImePUIswlHI-15Tyr024bOBDCVtZF9k17vWyIJ07zJ0_8IueiMkd3mjvxp5judW7swp9PXNYxhyphenhyphengX0/s400/five(1).jpg" width="400" /></a>Yet, from one of these efficiency "condominiums," five mail-in votes were cast in the runoff July 31. The names of the voters does not appear in the door or mail box of the units. And the manager says he does not remember five people living at the unit in addition to a young tenant and his father who now are the only ones to occupy the dwelling.<br />"There's no way seven people can live in one of those units," he said. "As far as I know, that many people have never lived there."<br />And yet, a statistical analysis of the mail-in votes cast in that runoff election indicate that they made up part of the total cast in that voting precinct in favor of JP 2-2 Erin Hernandez Garcia in her race against Yolanda Begum. And the name of the woman on the mailed envelopes is none other than a well-known politiquera allied with the Hernandezes.<br />But how could it be that the mail-in votes could have been cast from that unit?<br />"They were," said Mary Helen Flores, an anti-voting fraud activist with Citizens Against Voter Abuse (CAVA). "We have gone to knock on the door at least three times and the current tenant said that the voters no longer live there. At first he said that they had gone on vacation and would be back later. When we asked when, he said that they would be gone for months."<br />However, the tenant also told other people â€" including the manager of the complex â€" that the people listed as voting from his unit's address had left the apartment at least four months ago. That raises yet another question. If they left the apartment four months ago, how is it that they could have applied for the mail-in ballots from the Brownsville address. And the killer, of course. How could they have voted by mail from that address if they had been gone for two months after the July 31 runoff?<br />Could it be that someone had applied and received the mail-in ballots, filled them out an returned them, without their consent or knowledge? Did someone have their cards?<br />And here's the kicker: All of the five mail-in voters were listed as having an incapacity.<br />&nbsp;Those people have never lived there."<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6016803033174468094-7636631658330057661?l=rrunrrun.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>
LINK: http://rrunrrun.blogspot.com/2012/09/five-little-indiansthen-there-were-none.html

---------------------------------------------------------------
HISTORY REPEATED: FIRST TIME TRAGEDY, SECOND, A FARCE
---------------------------------------------------------------
By<strong> Juan Montoya</strong><br />Now we know why after process servers for the Yolanda Begum voter fraud lawsuit against Erin Hernandez Garcia served close to 100 subpoenas to potential witnesses, less than 20 showed up at the Cameron Conty Courthouse.<br />Some of those subpoenaed witnesses now have told us that politiqueras associated with the Erin Hernandez campaign knocked on their doors and told them that despite the warnings on the documents served them, they need not show up at&nbsp;courts as it directed them under penalty of law.<br />At least one Cameron Park resident said he ran off the politiquera and told her he had gotten in enough trouble listening to her before when he canst his ballot by&nbsp;mail and she took his and his mother's ballot with her promising&nbsp;to mail it for him.<br />Afterwards, the woman's name did not appear on the mail envelope. A man's name appeared instead.<br />The Texas Election Code is very specific on whose name must appear on the mail-in envelope. If anyone handled it, or if anyone assisted the voter, his or her name must appear on&nbsp;either the application or the mail-in envelope.<br /><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgJKG1X5gtbdiodFyLS4Fu6PtDXWdJIzfTbHxst9Hetg26kYDfBdiaYgpoSwzyNdlKg_PqL6u7T2ORdSS3h_ZQ8G-XWyhbIBYY19GqiMbG0ZrezFsWkbHAN9zFAofAiW9Au5fLZFnmJ87U/s1600/herminia" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgJKG1X5gtbdiodFyLS4Fu6PtDXWdJIzfTbHxst9Hetg26kYDfBdiaYgpoSwzyNdlKg_PqL6u7T2ORdSS3h_ZQ8G-XWyhbIBYY19GqiMbG0ZrezFsWkbHAN9zFAofAiW9Au5fLZFnmJ87U/s320/herminia" width="240" /></a>"I told her that the last time I listened to her&nbsp;it had resulted in me getting subpoenaed by the court because there were irregularities with my mail-in vote," he said. "I told her I was going to go and I was there at 9 a.m."<br />The voter then said that the woman then went down the street with a list to knock on doors and to give them the same message: that they didn't have to appear in court.<br />On the other side of town, at the Brownsville Housing Authority High Rise, some of the subpoenaed witnesses say that politiqueras such as Herminia Becerra and Tomasita Chavez also tried to dissuade them from appearing in court. A Begum supporter snapped&nbsp;a picture of super politiquera Becerra at the high rise at right.<br />There are at least two witnesses who said that Chavez went as far as taking the subpoenas from those who had been served and telling them not to go.<br />When witnesses arrived at the courthouse, they were met by other politiqueras who discouraged them from entering. Inside, Begum supporters who had taken coffee and pastries for the mostly elderly witnesses were separated from them even though they&nbsp;were going to testify on Begum's behalf&nbsp;by court bailiffs,&nbsp;specifically, a female bailiff at the door.<br />It was later learned that the same bailiff&nbsp;had&nbsp;met the Begum team members who were knocking on doors to find potential wrongdoing by Hernandez's campaign workers and ran them off from her personal residence.<br />"We were looking into whether someone had voted twice at that address and she got&nbsp;very belligerent and ran us off," said a worker. "We were surprised to find her at the courthouse."<br />That same bailiff told witnesses they had to leave when the court recessed from 10 a.m. until 1 p.m. and kept a couple separated from Begum's supporters by keeping them in a separate office away from them.<br />"All of Ernie Hernandez's people were there," said one. "Even Raul Salazar, his precinct&nbsp;assistant administrator was&nbsp;standing by the grand jury door. It was all rigged to intimidate the witnesses&nbsp;who did appear despite their discouraging them from going."<br />And so, just as they did in the first voter fraud trial against Ernie Hernandez in his runoff race against Ruben Peña two years ago, the Hernandez political machine blatantly subverted not only the election, but also the judicial process in the quest to impose a system of patronage and political domination in violation of all applicable laws. <br />And while some may say that the visiting judge's dictum that not enough time was left to hear the merits of the case and would interfere with the printing of the ballots, the fact remains that enough evidence would have been presented by the Begum legal team to prove â€" once again â€" that massive voter fraud was perpetrated in the runoff election that resulted in a victory for Erin Hernandez. <div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6016803033174468094-4321386966255916091?l=rrunrrun.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>
LINK: http://rrunrrun.blogspot.com/2012/09/by-juan-montoya-now-we-know-why-after.html





RSS URL: http://rrunrrun.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

This email sponsored by:

1&1 Internet - 6 Months Free on new Hosting packages
http://www.1and1.com/?k_id=7538907

This email is a service of QuickThreads.com.
To manage your subscriptions, login here:
http://www.quickthreads.com/myaccount.php
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

No comments:

Post a Comment